Digital transformation for chiefs and owners. Volume 3. Cybersecurity

Digital transformation for chiefs and owners. Volume 3. Cybersecurity
Dzhimsher Chelidze


This book contains a lot of material about information security, is replete with statistics, examples and money. The book provides step-by-step recommendations for protecting a company.As in the previous parts, I focus on a systematic approach, avoiding the classic mistake of focusing on technology and expecting a miracle from them. The book shows how information security is related to processes, competencies, internal communication, lean manufacturing and project management.





Digital transformation for chiefs and owners. Volume 3. Cybersecurity



Dzhimsher Chelidze



Cover designer Alexander Peremyshlin

Illustrator Alexander Peremyshlin

Editor Alexander Peremyshlin



© Dzhimsher Chelidze, 2024

© Alexander Peremyshlin, cover design, 2024

© Alexander Peremyshlin, illustrations, 2024



ISBN 978-5-0064-4211-5 (т. 3)

ISBN 978-5-0064-2489-0

Created with Ridero smart publishing system




Foreword


Hello, dear reader. This is the final book on digitalization and digital transformation. In the first book, we looked at what digitalization and digital transformation are, why they are needed, what is the difference, what are the pitfalls. In the second they were introduced to the system approach, which is applicable not only for digital transformation, but also in general for any business. The system approach combines proven tools and digitalization, is accessible to anyone and aims to increase the impact of digital technologies, as well as to minimize the risks associated with the organization of work. At the same time, in the first part we talked that in the role model for digital transformation a specialist in information security is needed. Additionally, this is the direction I decided to devote a separate book.

It would seem that digitalization and cyber-free are incompatible, but it is impossible to continue digitalizing without befriending them. Recently at Denis Batrankov I have met a good definition of why it is necessary to deal with information security now: Previously, security was built on the story of the shark: you do not need to be ahead of everyone floating from it – enough to be ahead of the latter. However, now, when you are the target of the shark – it is more difficult to defend”. Additionally, this definition very accurately describes the current situation, as every year hackers’ attacks become more targeted. Additionally, 2022 in general became a landmark.

This book would not have been without the research of Positive Technology (hereinafter – PT), which became my first guides to the world of cybersecurity. Additionally, if you like to immerse yourself thoroughly in the primary sources, details, I recommend you study these studies. QR codes and links to them will be at the end of the book.

The book consists of three parts. The first is devoted to the review and analysis of the current situation. There will be many numbers, statistics, analysts, money. The task of the first part – to form your awareness of the problem and the understanding that information security (hereinafter – IS) – is a direction as strategic as all digitalization, and it is worthy of your attention. The main thesis is at once – a bottleneck in security, as in all digitalization – processes and people, not only yours, but also in the team of software developers (further – software).

The second part deals with the integration of information security from a systems perspective.








Well, the third part is devoted to practical recommendations on what to do here and now, how to choose IT solutions for information security, what people need to know and what competencies are needed.

If you’ve read previous books, you already know my approach – to control someone and delegate tasks, to trust your team, you need at least a basic understanding of its work. And the key task of the whole book is to give you the basic knowledge to build effective work with your team and the IS Director (hereinafter – CISO) with the least labor and risk for you.

Additionally, to avoid any misunderstanding, let’s look at the difference between information security and cybersecurity?

Information security is an activity that involves the prevention of unauthorized access, use, disclosure, distortion, modification, research, recording or destruction of information.

Cyber security is all the same, only related to IT systems and computers.




Part 1. Why deal with information and cybersecurity?





Chapter 1. Immersion and About Money


In 2023, it is already obvious that without the use of digital technologies it is impossible to conduct business, live comfortably, and manage the state.

If we talk about public services, public services in the form of online services are developing around the world. Russia is among the world’s leaders. I, for example, I use the state’s digital services to record a child to a doctor, and to view his vaccinations with test results, and to pay fines, taxes, tax returns.

If we talk about the commercial sector, it can no longer without online: payment for goods, booking tickets, receiving services, consultations, the appearance of digital advisers.

In general, digitalization and automation everywhere. Additionally, if you ignore them, you will be simply uncompetitive. Additionally, if you want to understand what is waiting for us in about 5—10 years, I recommend reading the observations of Yevgeny Bazhov about what is happening in China, in his book Made in China. How to conduct online business in Chinese”.

Let us also, for example, touch on the work with personnel. Without cloud technology and hybrid / remote operation, it will be much more difficult for you to attract talented employees and/or you will significantly overpay for them. Yes, the labor market is changing, of course, and now again the employer is starting to dictate its terms to the average worker. However, this is about the average worker. Additionally, if you want to attract talent, removing is a powerful advantage. According to my personal observations the removal/hybrid saves up to 30—40% on the wage fund. Young, flexible, hungry to the success of the company are actively using it. Additionally, one of the tendencies I see in job openings is that people who want to pay less just give you the opportunity to work remotely. Of course, I do not keep detailed statistics on the closing dates of these vacancies, but they close quickly. It seems even faster than companies with higher salaries, but the requirement to be present at the office daily.

It would seem that this is happiness – digitalization. However, where there are opportunities, there are risks. For example, the development of removals in the year 2020 led to an increase in hacking messengers and collective conference systems. Okay, well, if we could just plug in and crash the online meetings, but the hackers have a different tactic – they copy confidential meeting and chat records to go after extortion. Another modern trend is the encryption of internal files for ransom.

It is also necessary to look at the small developers of IT products: they themselves may not be of interest to anyone, but they may be attacked in order to build into their product malware, and through it attack a large company. Additionally, you can realize such a scenario without even attacking the IT infrastructure – you just need to recruit a remote employee who will make the necessary changes to the code. This approach, when large companies are attacked through contractors and suppliers, is called “supply chain attack”. This is another of the main trends since 2021. In 2022, up to 30% of targeted attacks were on this tactic.

The risks are added by the increase in the complexity of IT solutions, and the decrease in the qualification of the average developer, because the cheaper the developer, the more profitable everything from the point of view of economics. Competition and the market want complex solutions at a minimum price, which obliges to look for ways to reduce the cost of the product. However, all of this leads to an increase in the number of holes in IT solutions. Additionally, you’re not only facing direct financial and legal risks associated with penalties from suppliers and government and criminal liability, but also reputational damage. And if you go public, it’s also the downside risks of capitalization.

The most striking example of this is the attack on SolarWinds. Their clients were US government agencies and over 400 major American companies. Hackers embedded the virus in their solution and attacked their clients. The result is a 40% drop in the value of the shares in a few weeks.

If you look at the absolute numbers, from the beginning of 2017 to the end of 2022, the number of recorded attacks increased from 985 to 2921, that is, an increase of 196.5%. Here, of course, it is necessary to take into account the fact that we have learned better to detect attacks, but, looking ahead, I will say that even now 70% of the companies studied revealed viruses that were not known. The number of targeted attacks increased from 43% in 2017 to 67% in 2022. And although there were 73% of targeted attacks in 2021, the probability of targeted attacks is high. After all, 2022 is the year of the war in cyberspace, real and large-scale.

Now about money. The average ransom price that companies pay hackers is also rising. If previously limited to $1—2 thousand, now it is 4.35 million. The same applies to the maximum payout. In 2017, it amounted to $1 million, in 2022 – already more than 40 million.

The projections are also pessimistic. Therefore, Cybersecurity Ventures expects that the global cost of information attacks will increase by 15% and by 2025 will reach $10.5 trillion per year worldwide, with 6 trillion in 2021 and 3 trillion in 2015.

I will also give you a graph from PT on how the attacks change, who were attacked more often, and who are now in demand among hackers.








Here I recommend to pay attention to the financial companies – they are less and less interesting as they become more and more complex for attacks. In general, the market of “civil” hacking is more and more subject to the laws of business: intruders are looking for how to reduce the cost of each attack and increase its profitability. Therefore, hackers are looking for margins. However, this applies only to hackers who do not engage in political orders or targeted attacks, for example, from competitors. As a result, given that there is growth away from mass attacks to targeted ones, it is not necessary to rely on one economic expediency of the attack. If you order, you will be attacked. Especially if you are a Russian company. Additionally, if you are the first person, then it is you under the gun in the first place.




Chapter 2. On responsibility


Now the head of the organization is responsible for information security, which is reflected in the decree of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin from 01.05.2022 250. Under its action fall federal executive authorities (federal ministries, services and agencies), management of subjects of the Russian Federation, state funds, state corporations and companies (for example, “Rosatom”, “Gazprom”, “Rushydro”, “RZD” and others) strategic and system-making enterprises, critical infrastructure facilities.

And while on April 20, 2020 the list of system-forming organizations included 646 legal entities, by July 2020 there were already about 1300, and in February 2022 – about 1400. However, you’d think if you weren’t on that list, why would you want it? It is necessary to understand that in our country, if you plan to grow, you will somehow start working with such organizations. This means that it is better to know the requirements of this document and be prepared. Overall, more than 500,000 organizations will fall under the new decree.

What is it recommended that organizations do under this decree?

– Establish personal responsibility for providing IS to the head of the organization, while allocating a separate Deputy General Director, who will have authority and resources to provide IS. It is either necessary to create a structural unit responsible for providing IS or to assign such functions to an existing unit.

– It is necessary to make an inventory of contracts with contractors providing IS services. Now such services can be provided only by companies that have a license to carry out activities on technical protection of confidential information from FSTEC Russia.

– Additionally, on March 30, 2022, restrictions were imposed on the acquisition of foreign equipment and software for subjects of critical information infrastructure (KIA), which make purchases for 223-FZ. Since January 1, 2025, organizations are prohibited from using information protection tools produced in unfriendly states, or organizations under their jurisdiction, directly or indirectly controlled by them or affiliated with them. There are 48 such countries in the spring of 2023. And even if the company supplying IS equipment, for example, from China, you still need to check its affiliates.

Going forward, I’ll make one guess. Taking into account all leaks and the importance of this topic for the state, you can expect the introduction of some insurance, following the example of the CTP. Each organization can be forced to insure against IS-risks. Additionally, then how the organization will build the IS function will influence the size of its premium.




Chapter 3. About General Trends


The main trend in the field of IS – professional managers come to the industry. Those who used to be engaged in “technology”, but now have grown up to managers. They think about the technical side of the issue, as well as about money, the processes in the organization, about the responsibility that they take on themselves. Additionally, this is a serious challenge for IS companies. After all, they need to communicate not just with experts who are in the topic, but find a common language with managers. That is to explain primarily in the language of money and guarantees.

The second trend – the transition from smeared protection throughout the organization, promotion of maturity levels and the use of best practices to a model of guaranteed protection against unacceptable scenarios: disruption of technological cycles, theft of money, confidential information, data encryption. That is, the transition from IS 1.0 to IS 2.0.

This is because everyone is already aware of the impossibility of protection from everything. First, the growth of digitalization and automation has led to an increase in the number of software used. Which means there’s an exponential increase in the number of attacks. Secondly, as we have said before, all IT solution developers try to reduce costs. For example, even the world IT giant IBM transfers its production to India, because there is cheaper labor programmers. At the same time, the quality of the code from most Indian developers leaves much to be desired. It’s like Chinese replicas of original products. All this leads to a decline in software quality and an increase in the number and criticality of vulnerabilities.

Additionally, even published “holes” developers do not hurry to eliminate quickly. Here are indicative statistics from PT. Of all vulnerabilities in industrial IT systems identified and sent to developers in 2021, less than half – 47%. In this case, they become known to the world quite quickly – within a few hours.

In total, about 25,000 new vulnerabilities discovered by security researchers were identified and confirmed in 2022.

The increase in the number of startups and their programs, as well as the failure to comply with the principles of safe development, can lead to this number being only increased.

As a result, it turns out that in more than half of the attacks, hackers quietly use these vulnerabilities and get the necessary access in a few minutes. PT specialists themselves, using known vulnerabilities, were able to access the internal network of companies in 60% of their projects. Additionally, now add the fact that there aren’t many white hackers and researchers, and the developers just don’t know about all the holes. Hackers do not seek to publish found vulnerabilities in the public domain. At the same time, the shadow market of hackers itself is on the rise.






Dynamics of the shadow market



Third, attacks become targeted rather than mass attacks. As mentioned earlier, it was 43 per cent, now it is 70 per cent.

Fourth, no matter how advanced the technology, the bottleneck is still people. Therefore, since 2017, the number of people caught on phishing letters, not only has not decreased, but, on the contrary, has increased multiple. Additionally, in the top most used and effective ways to penetrate the company is still phishing via email. In this case, the topics that people open most often remain unchanged from year to year: salary, bonuses, social programs, DMS, resume. In addition, the best mailing lists dedicated to events in a particular company or division. That is, the growing role of social engineering.








The statistics of attacks against ordinary people are interesting. After all, the endless leaks of personal data make it easier for hackers to choose the right people when planning an attack on the organization. So, in 2021 in 58% of attacks hackers infected users’ devices with malicious software: these were applications for remote control (34%), spyware (32%) and bank trojans (32%). By the end of 2022, spyware was already used in 49% of successful attacks.

At the end of 2022, phishing sites (42% of successful attacks) and emails (20%) were the most common source of infection. Hackers also combined people’s personal devices and organized so-called ddos attacks, that is, simply overloaded the IT infrastructure of the victim organization. Additionally, in massive phishing attacks hackers used the current news agenda: purchase of fake certificates of vaccination, creation of fraudulent sites before the European Football Championship, premiere of a new episode of the series “Friends” or other “delicious” event.

Additionally, fifthly, managers are pragmatic people who want guarantees. As a result, we came to the second trend – the formulation of simple and understandable for top managers queries, so that the unacceptable could not be implemented.

In my opinion, this is quite a normal situation. It is impossible to build up armor indefinitely and close. If you like to drive tanks, remember the example of the Mouse tank, which eventually became sluggish and in life could not move at all, becoming only a museum exhibit. At the same time, the development of technology still made it pierced. In the struggle of armor and projectile always in the end wins the projectile.

Returning to the language of business, I will share an observation. Increasing the armor sometimes leads to the growth of useless bureaucracy. I’ve seen companies close so that business processes stop, and people just go outside the company, start working communication and document exchange in open messengers and personal mail. After all, they have KPI and they require results. And waiting for a week or two until the technical support solves another problem, they cannot. In the end, we want to defend ourselves, but only by multiplying the risks.

The third trend is the development of cyber-polygons and cyber-battles, which provide an opportunity for cyberbes professionals to try their hand at detecting and suppressing malefactors, testing infrastructure and obtaining information for analysis and development. Additionally, since the beginning of 2023, there is active creation of programs to search for vulnerabilities for reward. Such programs are called Bug bounty. This allows “white” hackers and researchers to apply their knowledge for the good and get a reward for it. This applies mainly to the financial sphere (vulnerability search programs) and large corporations (participation in cyber battles).




Chapter 4. What happens in the Industry



Attacks on corporations and organizations are becoming increasingly like planned military operations – attacks on both equipment and people. Therefore, we already know about phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities and so on. However, in addition, there are specialized companies that are developing tools to penetrate various information systems. This is particularly the case in countries where such work is not restricted by legislation. That is, in principle, it is not an illegal business, and given the current situation, many countries are likely to turn a blind eye to it altogether.




Public administration and organizations


State organizations now, in 2022—2023, are undergoing a real combat baptism. In 2022, the number of successful attacks on government agencies increased in every quarter. Government agencies faced the highest number of incidents among any organization. They accounted for 17% of the total number of successful attacks (in 2021 this figure was 15%). In total, in 2022 PT recorded 403 incidents with state organizations, which is 25% more than in 2021.

The main way of attack is social engineering. The target of attacks is data. And this is understandable, because automation and digitalization into the state. Control is well under way. This means that public authorities are beginning to generate big data: taxes, medical information, biometrics, etc. Medical data are of special interest to hackers, including for the purposes of social engineering, increasing the effectiveness of phishing attacks.

The most popular types of malware were cryptographers (56%) and programs for remote control (29%). Additionally, the share of attacks on web resources is constantly growing – in 2020 there were 14%, by the end of 2022 – 41%.

Additionally, government structures are under attack not only in our country.

Example 1

In mid-October 2021, the hacker gained access to the Argentine government’s database, which contains information on all citizens’ identity cards. As a result, on the black-market data and ID-cards of the entire population of Argentina, that is, more than 45 million citizens were put on sale. Moreover, as a confirmation of the data, the hacker disclosed information about 44 known personalities, including the President of the country.

Example 2

Police Department of the US capital Washington. There was a massive leak of internal information after the attack of the extortion program. Thousands of confidential documents were published in the darkwebe (a segment of the Internet that is hidden from ordinary users, where people sell forged documents, weapons, drugs, and hackers orders). Hundreds of police files, informants and intelligence reports from other government agencies, including the FBI and the Secret Service, were also discovered.

Example 3

The hackers’ data encryption attack caused the collapse of the IT infrastructure of three hospitals in the United States, disrupted several routine surgeries, disrupted patient intake, and stole 1.5 TB of personal data, including medical records. The group received a $1.8 million ransom for decrypting the stolen information. A cyber-attack of extortionists on one of the main hospitals of Barcelona (Clinic de Barcelona) resulted in damage to the IT infrastructure of the clinic and forced to cancel 150 urgent operations and up to 3000 patient examinations (according to the Associated Press).

Example 4

Another interesting case was November 2022. At one of the forums in the darkeven there was a report about the hacking of the infrastructure of the Federal Tax Service of Russia. Hackers claimed to have downloaded 800 GB of confidential information. No official comments from the agency were received. The evidence included references to several projects, which according to hackers were taken from the NRF database. “It only took us a week to get into the IRS network, and only three people were involved in the hack. In fact, we have already captured several dozen state structures of this level. However, there is no need to claim them yet,” said the hackers in the message.

At the same time, another curious case with FTS occurred in 2019. Then it was possible to access two databases. The first contained more than 14 million data on people, and the second – 6 million. They included names, addresses, passport numbers, residence data, telephone numbers, TIN numbers, names of employers and information on taxes paid.

Example 5

An extortion attack on a Costa Rican government facility in April 2022. A group of extortionists, Conti, attacked Costa Rican institutions and demanded a $20 million ransom. Due to the inaccessibility of most of the country’s IT infrastructure, a state of emergency was declared, and later the attacked public sector was joined by Costa Rican health care, whose institutions were attacked by the Hive group.

Example 6

Burlington City, Canada, was the target of a phishing attack in which $503,000 was transferred to a cybercriminal rather than a real service provider.




Industry and energy


The industry is increasingly attracting cybercriminals: the number of attacks in 2021 exceeds the results of 2017 by more than 7 times. Additionally, in 2022, about 10 percent of all successful attacks came from industry. At the same time, industrial companies, in fact, are not ready to withstand complex attacks and malware. Thus, 95% of companies either do not protect their automated process control systems (ACS TP) special solutions, or do so partially. Additionally, a systematic approach to cybersecurity management, such as vulnerability management and software component upgrades, is also lacking in 93 percent of cases. This is in view of the fact that the damage from stopping business processes can be catastrophic, including with damage and destruction of equipment, man-made disasters. Companies are easier to follow hackers and pay ransom quietly.

What saves us now is that it is simply unprofitable for intruders to study technological parameters, to understand exactly what to change, because you can simply encrypt or steal confidential data. In my view, that is a key deterrent.

The general trend is also maintained here – the attacks are becoming more complex:

– using Malicious Software (71% Successful Attacks)

– social engineering (about 50%)

– exploitation of software vulnerabilities (41%).

Malware itself was distributed through IT equipment (49% of cases) and mail (43%). Interruptions to technological and business processes occurred in 47 per cent of cases. Additionally, mainly because of data encryption and data deletion software (vampers). During 2022, the share of ciphers increased from 53% in the first quarter to 80% in the third. The share of waxers reached 7% (in 2021 it was 1—2%).

The increasing share of vulnerability exploitation in attacks suggests that these methods are economically feasible, which already indicates a low level of protection in industry. And it was in software and hardware products designed for industry that the most dangerous vulnerabilities were discovered and corrected in 2021.

Industrialists and power engineers like and are aware of all risks, but the specificity of the industry does not allow to conduct full-scale exercises with the development of practical scenarios and the identification of unacceptable events. Therefore, there are now emerging cyber-test sites where you can use virtual or augmented environments without the risk of breaking processes and equipment, conducting any exercises and assessing the consequences. One such example is the Standoff event organized by PT.

In general, in 2021, the interests of hackers in Russia by branches of industry were distributed as follows:

– 31% aerospace industry;

– 23% of public organizations;

– 23% of IT-company;

– 15% Military Industrial Complex;

– 8% fuel and energy complex.

As for PT statistics, in their projects from the first half of 2020 to the second half of 2021 they managed to implement 87% of unacceptable events.




Finance


The financial sector is one of those who feel relatively well. The proportion of attacks on these organizations from the total number of attacks decreases from year to year. And most interestingly, there are no new groups seeking to withdraw money from banks. The reason for this is the maturity of the industry and the efforts of the Central Bank: regulations, investments in IT infrastructure and software, established information exchange. And this is understandable, if you steal money, you can see it here and now.

Organizations are attacked again through social engineering (47%) and the use of malware (downloaders, spyware, trojans, encryptors.

Theft of confidential information and stopping of key business processes (53% and 41% of cases respectively) were typical targets of bank attacks. Embezzlement was 6% successful.

Financial institutions are now under attack with the aim of:

– obtaining a better exchange rate;

– obtaining confidential information about the user and its use in other attacks by means of social engineering;

– increase system load and failures in users’ private offices.

In addition, there are still unsafe implementations of fast payment systems.

As a result, banks introduce all new security technologies:

– tighten the checks of KYC (mandatory verification of personal data of the client), including the development of services for checking documents (video calls with document recognition, downloading photos of documents, database checks, social activity assessment) to understand whether a real person is hiding behind an account;

– introduce machine learning systems to speed up, simplify and improve customer information retrieval, identify and block suspicious transactions.

As a result, the number of standard web vulnerabilities decreases, but the number of logical vulnerabilities, on the contrary, increases. And in many ways this is due to the development of ecosystems: the creation of more and more complex integrations, microservices, the introduction of voice assistants and chat bots.

However, there are two negative factors that allow PT specialists to find vulnerabilities in each organization that allow them to penetrate the internal IT infrastructure. First, security patches released by software developers are often ignored by the IT services of organizations and are not installed. Second, there is always a possibility of a vulnerability, which is still unknown to developers, but it was discovered by researchers of intruders. Such vulnerabilities are called “zero-bottom vulnerabilities”. Additionally, these factors are the key to getting the hacker inside the infrastructure, so you need to learn how to spot them in time.

In total, PT specialists were able to penetrate the internal network of organizations in 86% of cases. PT researchers also gained full control over the infrastructure and implemented unacceptable events: access to bank-critical systems, ARMA treasurers, money exchange servers. In total, PT experts managed to implement more than 70% of unacceptable events in each financial institution.

As a result, the extortionists will continue their attacks on the banks. So far, these attacks are easier to execute and cumulatively bring more profit than attempts to withdraw a large amount of money from accounts. However, now one of the main targets of hackers will be the clients of banks that use online banking. According to the Central Bank of Russia, in 2020, 75% of adults used online banking. Therefore, hackers will continue to develop the direction of compromising banking applications. Additionally, the techniques of social engineering will remain in use.

The main method is phishing – it accounts for 60% of attacks. Hackers were happy to borrow on other people’s names, foreign companies that now need to repay these loans.

As a result, if it was previously profitable to attack companies with the aim of stealing money from accounts, the work done by the regulator, and the development of protection systems reduce the attractiveness of financial companies, need too high competence and technical equipment. However, industry is the opposite. There hackers are just interested in data about clients, internal users and any information that relates to trade secrets.

Again, this leads to an increase in attacks on confidential data (from 12% to 20%). Personal data (32%), accounting data (20%) and medical information (9%) are also popular.

In general, 14% of attacks were directed at ordinary people, and 88% of attacks were through social engineering. Additionally, the ultimate goal in 66% of the cases – accounting and personal data.

Closing the chapter, I will give some more examples of the most resonant attacks of 2022 on organizations from the commercial sector:

– Lapsus$ group has hacked a number of large IT companies. It was first attacked by Okta, which develops solutions for account and access management, including multi-factor authentication support. Nvidia’s GPU developer was then attacked, resulting in the theft of 1 TB of data, including video card driver source code and software signing certificates. The stolen Nvidia certificates were used to distribute malware. In March, criminals were able to hack Microsoft and Samsung by stealing the source code of some products.

– The Swiss airline company Swissport, which operates at 310 airports in 50 countries, has been attacked by an extortion program. The attack caused numerous flight delays and a 1.6 TB data leak.

– The attack on the telecommunications operator Vodafone in Portugal caused disruptions in service throughout the country, including in the operation of the 4G and 5G networks. Vodafone Portugal serves more than 4 million cellular subscribers.

– In October, a cyber-attack on Supeo, an IT service provider for the largest Danish railway company, stopped trains for several hours. Supeo provides a solution that machinists use to access critical information – work data on tracks and speed limits. During the attack, the provider shut down its servers, causing the application to malfunction, and the drivers were forced to stop the trains. After the restoration of train traffic, the next day did not go on schedule.

– In March, Toyota suspended 14 factories in Japan for a day due to a cyber-attack on Kojima Industries, a component supplier. The cyber-attack also affected other Japanese car manufacturers – Hino and Daihatsu Motors.

– In the second quarter, a major attack occurred on three Iranian steel mills, disrupting technological processes, and in one of the factories, the attackers managed to bring down a liquid iron bucket and cause a fire.




Chapter 5. About Technology





Cloud computing


One of the most sought-after technologies for digitalization and digital transformation are cloud computing, storage and services. Accordingly, the focus in the IS organization is increasingly shifting to the responsibility of providers. Here you need to look from two angles:

– major cloud service and infrastructure providers;

– local startups and small providers.

As for the first, everything is fine here: the major providers realize that they will attack, and therefore will take measures. Forewarned means armed. Additionally, in general, cloud services of large providers are developed on the principle of “all enemies around”, plus they have competent specialists in IS. Such centralization also allows fewer professionals to protect more data.

However, relative to startups and small providers are getting sadder. They don’t have the resources, and they’re likely to lose most of their money clients. The same applies to local data centers and IT services that develop within industrial companies. They are generally unable to provide the necessary level of protection. Or, as they said earlier, they just begin to go into a blind defense, and for business loses all sense of such cloud services, they are simply impossible to use. At the same time, the number of malware for Linux is growing.

The fact that almost 40% of all vulnerabilities identified and closed in 2021 with the help of PT researchers have a high level of danger also makes you wonder. Most importantly, 12.5% of all vulnerabilities have been identified in the software designed to provide protection against hacker attacks. Additionally, despite all the current situation and sanctions, the guys from PT comply with the responsible disclosure policy regarding the found vulnerabilities, i.e. inform the developers about all found vulnerabilities before they are published in the public domain.




Mobile applications


The second area that is developing along with digitalization is mobile applications: for customers and loyalty programs, for employees, mobile handlers, fixation of dangerous events, public services. Any larger organization has its own application.

At the same time, according to PT, the most popular vulnerability of mobile applications is storing user data in an open (or easily reversible) form. There was also a situation where important data was stored in public directories. Additionally, the overall share of deficiencies associated with unsafe data storage was more than 33% of all vulnerabilities found. That is, what hackers are interested in, and is one of the most frequent problems.

Experts of PT in 2022 conducted a study of 25 pairs of applications (Android – iOS). Almost everyone had problems with data storage. One of the key reasons is the excessive confidence of developers in system protection mechanisms at the level of the operating system, ignoring multi-level protection.

The largest share of vulnerabilities (14%) was in the public storage of user data. The second place was divided by vulnerabilities related to checking the integrity of applications and storing confidential information in the code (9%).

Additionally, almost every application has at least one of the following flaws:

– no detection of operating system hacking (root on Android and jailbreak on iOS);

– lack of integrity control of executable files;

– no obfuscation (code entanglement).

Android and iOS: who is safer?

Android apps have always been considered a good target for hackers: open system, wide options, easy to leave a hole in the app. With iOS it has always been the other way around: developers have little opportunity to make a mistake and leave the unnecessary “doors” open. Additionally, there was a paradigm – we buy for TOPs devices on iOS, and they are protected. However, now there is a change in this trend. Google is increasingly restricting applications, forcing developers to specify the necessary functionality. Additionally, according to recent news, Android 14 will completely block the ability to install legacy apps. And both through the application store and through self-downloading installation files. In iOS, by contrast, new ways of interacting with the operating system and with each other are becoming available to applications. In general, the boundary between platforms is blurred, and using iOS devices for TOPs in the hope of absolute security becomes too risky an undertaking.




Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.


Текст предоставлен ООО «Литрес».

Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию (https://www.litres.ru/pages/biblio_book/?art=70995106?lfrom=390579938) на Литрес.

Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.


Digital transformation for chiefs and owners. Volume 3. Cybersecurity Dzhimsher Chelidze
Digital transformation for chiefs and owners. Volume 3. Cybersecurity

Dzhimsher Chelidze

Тип: электронная книга

Жанр: Руководства

Язык: на английском языке

Издательство: Издательские решения

Дата публикации: 21.08.2024

Отзывы: Пока нет Добавить отзыв

О книге: This book contains a lot of material about information security, is replete with statistics, examples and money. The book provides step-by-step recommendations for protecting a company.As in the previous parts, I focus on a systematic approach, avoiding the classic mistake of focusing on technology and expecting a miracle from them. The book shows how information security is related to processes, competencies, internal communication, lean manufacturing and project management.

  • Добавить отзыв